Legal Opinion

Lewellyn v. Tultz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 17, 1944Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed on the law, without costs of this appeal to any party and motion granted, without costs. Memorandum: The denial of appel*1040lant’s application to intervene in this action is based upon the grounds stated in the opinion rendered by the court below in Laude v. Goodhead (181 Misc. 807), which opinion the court adopted as its opinion in deciding the motion in this ease. While we agree with the statement that appellant has no right or interest in the subject of the action, unless he has the same under the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 as amended (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, §…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Ladue v. Goodhead, New York County Courts1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API