Legal Opinion

Hartge v. Capeloto

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1925No. 19370. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

— The plaintiff, Hartge, as assignee of the defendant Riley, commenced this action in the superior court for King county, seeking recovery from the defendants, Capeloto and the community composed of himself and wife and Riley, upon a promissory note, reading as follows:

“$500.00 Seattle, Wash., December 19th, 1924.
“For value received, I promise to pay to Howard H. Riley, or order, Five Hundred and no/100 Dollars in Gold Coin of the United States of America, with interest thereon in like Gold Coin at the rate of eight per cent per annum from date until paid, payable in monthly installments of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bardsley v. Washington Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. James v. Brainard-Jackson & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Cook v. StrelauWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cassiani v. BellinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  2. Glassmaker v. RicardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  3. Saldaña Muñoz v. Rodríguez DíazSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936
  4. Saldaña Muñoz v. Rodríguez DíazSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API