Legal Opinion
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lee
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 30, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00296Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Case No. 24-cv-00296-ABA v. XUE LEE, A/K/A “SAM” LEE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed this case alleging that Defendants Xue Lee (“Lee”) and Brenda Chunga (“Chunga”) defrauded investors in violation of U.S. securities laws. After Lee failed to respond to the complaint, the SEC obtained a Clerk’s entry of default. ECF No. 18. Lee has filed a pro se motion requesting that the Court vacate the default and dismiss the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Castro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Carefirst of Maryland, Inc. v. Carefirst Pregnancy Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.