Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. New Jersey Department of Corrections
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 28, 2004PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
PAYNE, J.A.D.
Petitioner Frederick Hamilton, a convicted prison inmate, was the subject of an unsigned “snitch” note stating that he and another inmate had been observed injecting heroin. He was ordered to give a urine sample, which tested positive for opiates. Hamilton was charged with the commission of prohibited act *.204, use of a prohibited substance (see N.J.A.C. 10A:4-4.1(a)), and he pled guilty to the charge. Although his initial sanction was *286higher, following a plea for leniency, Hamilton received ninety days of administrative segregation,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. O'HAGENNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- A.A. v. Attorney GeneralNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
- AA Ex Rel. BA v. ATTY. GENERALNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
- Scott v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- CHRISTIAN VASILE VS. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.