Legal Opinion

Cleveland v. Mochel

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1929No. 5261PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIVENS, J.-

— -In May, 1927, appellants agreed to purchase from respondents a certain dwelling-house in Lewiston, to pay a portion of the purchase price at that time and the balance at certain future dates. Thereafter and in the same month appellants entered into possession. About the middle of August, appellants notified respondents that they elected to rescind the contract, alleging fraudulent representations, and thereafter instituted this action to rescind and for the return of the money which they had paid.

Appellants assign as error the refusal of the trial court to permit an amendment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nelson Bennett Co. v. Twin Falls Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Fawcett v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Miller v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Pittock v. PittockIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Eastwood v. Standard Mines & Milling Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mochel v. ClevelandIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Evans v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. In Re Appeal From the Department of ReclamationIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  4. McCarty v. SauerIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  5. South Boise Water Co. v. McDonaldIdaho Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API