People v. Bryan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, we find that the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant contends that the People failed to prove his identity as the perpetrator of the instant robbery beyond a reasonable doubt. The complainant testified that, during the robbery, he…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. . GaimariNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- People v. GarafoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- People v. TrowbridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. FieldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. CosmeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. PadillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. GordilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.