Legal Opinion

Bank of Hoxie v. Meriwether

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 20, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J?,

(after stating the facts). The first question to be decided is, does the party wall agreement between C. J. 'Saenger and E. P. Richardson, executed on the 14th day of May, 1913, constitute a covenant running with the land? The agreement was in writing, and provides for the erection of a party wall thirteen inches wide, one-half of which was to be on the lots of the respective parties, and was to be owned in common. Inasmuch as Saenger was to erect his store building first, it was provided that the party wall should be erected by him and constitute a part of his store building. When…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Peebles v. Eminent Household of Columbian WoodmenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  2. Shall v. BiscoeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1856
  3. Lay v. GainesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  4. Little Red River Levee District No. 2 v. GarrettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  5. Rugg v. LemleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. Ritchie Grocer Company v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  3. Woods v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  4. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Hamilton Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  5. Fort Smith Gas Co. v. GeanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API