Legal Opinion

Hodges v. Fanning

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 4, 1976No. 20212PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs-respondents, Ray and Carolyn Hodges, obtained orders of default against defendants- appellants, William Fanning and Birobal Corp. Defendants’ motion to vacate the orders was denied by the lower court. We affirm.

The motion to vacate the default orders was made under S. C. Code § 10-1213 (1962), which authorizes the court in its discretion to relieve a party from an order “taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect.” Additionally, the moving party must have a meritorious defense. Evans v. Fiat-Roosevelt Motors, Inc., S. C., 222 S. E. (2d) 282…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simon v. FlowersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  2. McInerny v. TolerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  3. Poston v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  4. Evans v. Fiat-Roosevelt Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hodges v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1980
  2. Blakely v. WrightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  3. McEachern v. PostonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  4. Thompson v. WilderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  5. Thompson v. HammondSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API