Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Hammond

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 31, 1989No. 23054Published

1Opinion of the Court

299 S.C. 116 (1989)

382 S.E.2d 900

Sidney THOMPSON, Respondent

v.

F.C. HAMMOND, Horry County, John Doe, and Any Other Persons Claiming an Interest Defendants, of whom Horry County and John Doe are Petitioners.

23054

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Heard December 7, 1988.

Decided July 31, 1989.

James B. Van Osdell and Cynthia Graham Howe, of Van Osdell, Lester, Stewart, McCutchen & Brittain, P.A., Myrtle Beach, for petitioners.

John P. Henry and Emma Ruth Brittain, Conway, for respondent.

Heard Dec. 7, 1988.

Decided July 31, 1989.

TOAL, Justice:

The dispositive issue in this case is whether relief from a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ledford v. Pennsylvania Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Graham v. Town of LorisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. Mitchell Supply Co. v. GaffneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  4. Thompson v. HammondSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. McInerny v. TolerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API