Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Tribune Publishing Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 28, 1911No. 9826PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered April IT, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
— Action by W; L. Hoffman and E. H. Godfrey, copartners, against the Tribune Publishing Company, a corporation, to recover the purchase price of three electric mo*468tors. From a judgment in plaintiffs’ favor, the defendant has appealed.
On July 13, 1910, respondents made, and appellant in writing accepted, the following proposition:
“July 13th, 1910. F. H. G.
“Tribune Publishing Co., City.
“Gentlemen: We submit the following figures on motors for your plant:
“One (1) 3 H. P. 220 volt 2° 60 cycle 1800 R. P. M. with pulley and base complete......... $68.00
“One (1) 5 H. P. 220 volt 2° 60 cycle 1800 R.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gordon v. Parke & Lacy Machinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
- Hockersmith v. FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Tobin v. McArthurWashington Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- Meyer Bros. Drug Co. v. CallisonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Gleason Co. v. CarmanWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Calvin Philips & Co. v. Newoc Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918