Legal Opinion
Carey v. Corporation Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 29, 1934No. 24930PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.
Logan W. Carey, receiver of the properties of the Consolidated Gas Company, hereinafter referred to as company, appeals from an order of the Corporation Commission of Oklahoma, in causes Nos. 10950 and 10970, consolidated for trial and appeal, reducing the gate rate charge for natural gas to the towns of Mangum and Granite. Each of these towns operates its own gas distributing system, and buys its gas from the company at its city limits. This gas is purchased under a written contract (separate for each town), specifying the charges, and has several years to run. Each town petitioned -for a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Lindheimer v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- American Indian Oil Gas Co. v. Geo. F. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- City of Durant v. Consumers' Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Davenport Water Co. v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- State v. Tri-State Telephone and Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- United Transit Company v. NunesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965
- Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- In Re Petition of Nj American Water Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.