Ex parte Hurn
Supreme Court of Alabama
Application by petition by W. P. Hurn, for a mandamus to the City Court of Montgomery, Hon. Tiios. M. Arrington presiding, on the facts stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMANJ'T.
The petitioner -Hum, having been arrested on the criminal charge of fraudulently obtaining goods on a credit, ivas searched by the officer making the arrest, who took from him eleven hundred and twenty-four 40-100 dollars, found concealed in his clothing. The prisoner and the money were delivered to the sheriff of the-county. An attachment, having been sued out against the defendant Hurn, was placed in the hands of the sheriff, and by him levied upon the money in his possession. This was followed by a writ of garnishment executed by the coroner of the county upon the sheriff. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ex Parte Phenix Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Spalding v. PrestonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1848
- Street v. SinclairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Chastang v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Commercial Exchange Bank v. McLeodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Youman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Hughes v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
- Banks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Brinegar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.