Legal Opinion

Schnell v. Allbright-Nell Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 9, 1965No. Nos. 14619, 14620PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENOCH, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellees, Carl Schnell and The Griffith Laboratories, Inc., brought this action in the United States District Court to recover damages for patent infringement. The District Court held that each of plaintiffs’ patents, as follows :

Patent Number Claims

2,840,318 2

2,906,310 1 through 8

2.934.120 1 and 2

2.934.121 1 through 24

Re. Pat. 24,765 1 through 3 5 through 15

3,044,514 1 through 14 17 and 18

Re. Pat. 24,683 1 through 16

were valid and infringed by defendants. The defendants, The Allbright-Nell Company and Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc., have appealed from that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. United States v. FornessCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Las Colinas, Inc., and Eastern Shore Development Corporation, Debtors, Appeal of Vigdor SchreibmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  2. Research Corporation v. Nasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  3. Ramey Construction Company, Inc. v. The Apache Tribe Of The Mescalero ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  4. General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1972
  5. Canaan Products, Inc. v. Edward Don & CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API