Legal Opinion

Rashford Lumber Co. v. Dolan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, J.

As to the amount and quality of lumber received by defendant under the agreement, the evidence is somewhat contradictory, but we are precluded by the findings of the court from weighing the evidence on that subject and are required by the law to assume that such findings are correct. The only question left for our consideration is the plea urged by the defendant that the plaintiff has failed to comply with the laws of Oregon by transacting business in this state without filing a declaration of its intention so to do, paying its license fee and appointing an attorney-in-fact in this state.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commercial Bank v. ShermanOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Loveland v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Endicott, Johnson & Co. v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Major Creek Lum. Co. v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Deardorf v. Idaho Nat. Harvester Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Enco, Inc. v. F. C. Russell Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. Spokesman Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Crites v. Associated Frozen Food Packers, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Klarr v. HeckartOregon Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API