Legal Opinion
Martin v. Pomeroy Computer Resources, Inc.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided July 27, 1999No. 5:98CV16, 5:98CV33, 5:98CV108PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THORNBURG, District Judge.
THESE MATTERS are before the Court on the motion for partial summary judgment of Lanetca, Inc. (Lanetca) and Robert Martin (Martin). For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact and judgment for the moving party is warranted as a matter of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). A genuine issue exists if a reasonable jury considering the evidence could return a verdict for the nonmoving party, Pomeroy Computer Resources, Inc. (Pom-eroy). Shaw v. Stroud, 13…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mathis v. Brown & Brown of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Lafargue v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2001