Legal Opinion
United States v. Justin Tanner Petersen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 22, 1996No. 96-50037, 96-50040, 96-50038 and 96-50039PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Justin Tanner Petersen appeals from the sentence imposed after his plea of guilty to charges of computer fraud, possession of a stolen vehicle transported across state lines, conspiracy to commit computer fraud and wire fraud, and interception of wire and electronic communications in four separate cases consolidated for sentencing. Petersen challenges the district court’s (1) two-level upward adjustment for use of a special skill based upon his computer skills; (2) two-level upward adjustment for obstruction of justice; (3) failure to reduce the offense level…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. SarnoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Edward X. MondelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Jerry D. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Obet Lagumbay RamiloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. NoahCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Bill LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Harold STODDARD, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. ProchnerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Michael LordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.