Rae v. Nelson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.
Plaintiff, as administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, George Rae, junior, seeks damages from the defendants for the use and benefit of herself, as .widow, and George Paul Rae, her minor son.
The following facts are undisputed: That plaintiff is the widow, and George Paul Rae, four years of age, the minor son, of George Rae, junior, deceased, and that plaintiff is the administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband. That the defendant Millard T. Nelson is a regularly licensed physician and surgeon, and that the defendant St. Helens Clinic, Inc., is a Washington corporation,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dahl v. WagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Dishman v. Northern Pacific Beneficial Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Howatt v. CartwrightWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Coombs v. JamesWashington Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hall v. PartlowWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Chase Barnes, on behalf of himself individually and all others similarly situated v. Key Tronic CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2025
- State Of Washington v. Andrew MorrillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019