Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Rosenthal

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 1, 1953PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

26 N.J. Super. 400 (1953)

98 A.2d 338

MAURICE ROSENTHAL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

NELL ROSENTHAL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 22, 1953.

Decided July 1, 1953.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, SMALLEY and SCHETTINO.

Mr. Nathan N. Schildkraut argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Kahn & Schildkraut, attorneys).

Mr. William A. Ancier argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Kessler & Kessler, attorneys).

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order amending support and custody provisions of a judgment nisi.

We adopt the opinion of the trial judge…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rosenthal v. RosenthalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Limpert v. LimpertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  2. Pogue v. PogueNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API