Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Rosenthal

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 19, 1952PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

19 N.J. Super. 521 (1952)

88 A.2d 655

MAURICE ROSENTHAL, PLAINTIFF,

v.

NELL ROSENTHAL, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided May 19, 1952.

Messrs. Kahn and Schildkraut (Mr. Nathan N. Schildkraut appearing), attorneys for plaintiff.

Messrs. Kessler & Kessler (Mr. Samuel I. Kessler appearing), attorneys for defendant.

EWART, J.S.C.

This matter comes before the court on notice by plaintiff, supported by affidavit, on application:

"* * * for an order to modify the terms of the Judgment Nisi entered in this action as to the custody and support of the child of the parties to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richards v. CollinsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
  2. Streitwolf v. StreitwolfSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  3. Seitz v. SeitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. Ziesel v. ZieselSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
  5. Caruso v. CarusoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Strom v. StromAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  2. Jonitz v. JonitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  3. Limpert v. LimpertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  4. Greiman v. FriedmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Rosenthal v. RosenthalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API