Nash v. Consolidated City of Jacksonville
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
VANCE, Circuit Judge:
This case involves step two of the familiar three-step analysis for Title VII disparate impact claims. The district court found first that appellant had satisfied his initial burden of identifying an employment practice with a discriminatory impact. The district court next found that appellee had avoided a finding of discrimination against it by satisfying its burden of demonstrating that the practice was a business necessity and had a manifest relationship to the employment in question. Because we hold that appellee has not satisfied this burden, we reverse without…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Connecticut v. TealSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rush Pettway, Etc. v. American Cast Iron Pipe Company, United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- William H. Hamer v. City of Atlanta, United States of America v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. City of Montgomery, Ala.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1989
- 53 Fair empl.prac.cas. 672, 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,893 Winston Nash v. The Consolidated City of Jacksonville, Duval County, Florida, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ATLAS PAPER BOX COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ATLAS PAPER BOX COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989