Legal Opinion

Nash v. Consolidated City of Jacksonville

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 25, 1988No. 87-3360PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANCE, Circuit Judge:

This case involves step two of the familiar three-step analysis for Title VII disparate impact claims. The district court found first that appellant had satisfied his initial burden of identifying an employment practice with a discriminatory impact. The district court next found that appellee had avoided a finding of discrimination against it by satisfying its burden of demonstrating that the practice was a business necessity and had a manifest relationship to the employment in question. Because we hold that appellee has not satisfied this burden, we reverse without…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Connecticut v. TealSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Rush Pettway, Etc. v. American Cast Iron Pipe Company, United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. William H. Hamer v. City of Atlanta, United States of America v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. City of Montgomery, Ala.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1989
  3. 53 Fair empl.prac.cas. 672, 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,893 Winston Nash v. The Consolidated City of Jacksonville, Duval County, Florida, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  4. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ATLAS PAPER BOX COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ATLAS PAPER BOX COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API