Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ATLAS PAPER BOX COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1989No. 87-5421Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJulian Abele Cook, District Judge

I concur with my distinguished colleagues, who have concluded that this cause should be reversed. However, it is my belief that a remand is inappropriate under the circumstances of this case. Moreover, I believe that the trial record mandates a much broader review and critical analysis of the Appellee’s hiring practices and testing procedures than that which has been provided in the prevailing opinion.

I

On January 30, 1987, the trial court rejected a contention by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) that the Atlas Paper Box Company (Atlas) was guilty of racial discrimination in…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API