Legal Opinion
Steigerwalt v. the Woodhead Co. Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 22, 1932No. 28,971PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 244 N.W. 412. This was a suit to recover payments made by an infant upon a conditional sale contract to purchase a Ford coupé. The defendants sought to recoup their damages on account of depreciation of the car due to its use by the plaintiff, and the trial court sitting without a jury found in favor of the defendants upon that ground. The plaintiff has appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
While the plaintiff was in his twenty-first year he entered into an instalment contract for the purchase of a Ford coupé from the Woodhead Company, representing to them…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Myers v. Hurley Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Johnson v. Northwestern Mutual Life Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Conrad v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- Berglund v. American Multigraph Sales Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Alt v. GraffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sternlieb v. Normandie National Securities Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Ser Yang v. Western-Southern Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Burnet v. ChapinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934
- PHL Variable Insurance v. 2008 Christa Joseph Irrevocable TrustDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Kelley v. BMO Harris Bank N.A., as successor to M&I Marshall and IIsley BankDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023