Legal Opinion

Teubner v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 3, 1944No. 33,719PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Streissguth, Justice.

This proceeding was commenced in 1942 by two friends of Mrs. Rose Masters to have her restored to capacity after she had been adjudged feeble-minded and committed as such to a state school. The probate court, after hearing the testimony of petitioners and two other lay witnesses in support of the petition for restoration, granted a motion to “disallow” it on the ground that “none of the witnesses were experts in mental cases.” On appeal, the district court, after hearing both lay and expert testimony, pro and con, found that Mrs. Masters was feeble-minded, and in all…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Blaisdell v. BillingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Juster Bros. Inc. v. ChristgauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. In Re Guardianship of StromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Dittrich v. UblSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Swick v. SheridanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lausche v. Commissioner of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Doren ex rel. Doren v. Northwestern Baptist Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. State Ex Rel. Hartmann v. LundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API