Legal Opinion

Burlington Northern Railroad Company and Meridian Land and Mineral Company v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 9, 1985No. Appeal 84-989PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Claims Court dismissing without prejudice Burlington Northern Railroad Company’s (Burlington) suit seeking just compensation from the United States under the fifth amendment for the alleged taking of Burlington’s coal reserves in Custer National Forest. We affirm.

I

Burlington filed a petition in the Claims Court alleging that it owns substantial mineral reserves, including coal, which are under federal and privately-owned lands within the Custer National Forest. Burlington contended that section 522(e)(2)(B) of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. American President Lines, Ltd., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. United States, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Loveladies Harbor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  3. Cogar v. SommervilleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Conant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  5. Hannon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API