Legal Opinion
Hollister v. Tuttle
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 28, 2000No. 98-35058PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
210 F.3d 1033 (9th Cir. 2000)
MICHAEL A. HOLLISTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ROBERT TUTTLE; JOHN COOPER; PETER CARAFIOL; SHELLEY REECE; MARVIN KAISER; DEANNE WESTBROOK; ELAINE LIMBAUGH; CHRISTINE THOMPSON; SUSAN DANIELSON, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 98-35058
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Argued and Submitted March 8, 2000
Filed March 30, 2000
Amended April 28, 2000
COUNSEL: Brian R. Talcott and G. Kenneth Shiroishi, Michael Francis, Dunn, Carney, Allen, Higgins & Tongue, Portland, Oregon, for the plaintiff-appellant.
Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, Oregon,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ginnine Fried v. JP Morgan Chase & CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Hollister v. TuttleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
3Cited by2 opinions
- John Ellins v. City of Sierra MadreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- John Ellins v. City of Sierra MadreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013