Legal Opinion
Hollister v. Tuttle
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 30, 2000No. 98-35058PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on March 30, 2000 is amended as follows:
Slip Opinion at 3670, Line 28 (Fourth Paragraph, Second Sentence). Insert “generally” between “number of units” and “be treated”, so that the sentence reads: “nor can a reduction in the number of units generally be treated as a kind of demotion.”
Slip Opinion at 3670, Line 30 (Fourth Paragraph, Fourth Sentence). Insert, “In this case,” at the beginning of the sentence so that it reads, “In this case, the shortening of the American Literature and Culture course from 9 to 8 hours is not a wrong cognizable in a civil rights action.”
Sli…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Manhattan Beach Police Officers Association, Inc. v. City of Manhattan Beach David J. Thompson Harry L. Kuhlmeyer, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Johnson v. BarkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Joyce C. Johnston v. Richard Koppes Robert TousignantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hollister v. TuttleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- John Ellins v. City of Sierra MadreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- DeFrancesco v. Arizona Board of RegentsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Jackson v. Twin Falls City IdahoDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021
- Meadows v. BreakieDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2022