Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cua v. Morrison

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1992No. 29A02-9112-CV-566Published

1ConcurrenceSullivan, Judge

The Authorization for Release of Information ordered by the Hamilton Cireuit Court to be signed by the plaintiff Cua is identical to the Authorization for Release of Information ordered by the Montgomery Circuit Court and reviewed by our First District in Lytle v. Miller, an unpublished decision in an interlocutory appeal ordered dismissed by our Supreme Court. That order of dismissal, dated June 4, 1992, reads as follows:

"Comes now Appellant, Steven Lytle, by counsel, and files his 'Petition for Transfer. He asks this Court to reverse the Court of Appeals' memorandum decision filed December…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. State v. HoganIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. VanoverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Barco Beverage Corp. v. Indiana Alcoholic Beverage CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API