Legal Opinion

Barco Beverage Corp. v. Indiana Alcoholic Beverage Commission

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1991No. 49A02-8809-CV-343PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUCHANAN, Judge.

ON REHEARING

In our original opinion, appearing as Barco Beverage Corp. v. Ind. Alcoholic Beverage Comm'n (1990), Ind.App., 563 N.E.2d 658, we upheld in part Rule 28, promulgated by the Ind. Alcoholic Beverage Commission (the Commission), which prohibited producers and wholesalers of alcoholic beverages from agreeing to territorial limitations on the distribution of their products. We sustained the rule as it applied to brewers, vintners and beer and wine wholesalers, but we determined Rule 28 was invalid as it applied to distillers, rectifiers and liquor wholesalers. We now…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Central Beverage Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n v. Raike Ex Rel. MinnemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Beermart, Inc. v. The Stroh Brewery CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Lafayette Beverage Distributors, Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1982
  5. U. S. Steel Corp. v. CicilianIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller Brewing Co. v. Best Beers of Bloomington, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Barco Beverage Corp. v. Indiana Alcoholic Beverage CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Cua v. MorrisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Cua v. MorrisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Little Beverage Co., Inc. v. DePrezIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API