Legal Opinion

Field v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 29, 1932No. 3489Published

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Court which overruled appellant’s protest and held certain linen and cotton handkerchiefs dutiable as assessed under paragraph 1529 of the Tariff Act of 1930, the material portion of which paragraph follows:

Par. 1529. * * *(b) Handkerchiefs * * * embroidered (whether with a plain or fancy initial, monogram, or otherwise, and whether or not the embroidery is on a scalloped edge), * * * all the foregoing, finished or unfinished, of whatever material composed, * * * valued at more than 70 cents per dozen, 4 cents each and 40 per…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Durbrow & Hearne Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  2. Sloane v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  3. Kayser & Co. v. PevnyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. United States v. WaentigU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1909
  5. United States v. Grass Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API