Legal Opinion
Kayser & Co. v. Pevny
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 2, 1926No. 2560PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge
The merchandise, the classification of which is here involved, consists of sueded, warp-knit, cotton fabric gloves, similar to those under consideration in the case of Kayser & Co. (Inc.) v. United States, suit No. 2549, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 474, T. D. 41367, which opinion is handed down concurrently herewith.
The two cases were heard in this court as well as before the Board ■of General Appraisers at different times, but because the same statutes are involved and practically the same issues presented, they have been considered together in this court and treated as companion ■cases.
The question…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kayser & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. Field & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
- Sloane v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- United States v. WaentigU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1909
- United States v. Grass Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Whitlock Cordage Co. v. Untied StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Kotzin Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Henri Bendel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
- Bruce Duncan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Field v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.