Legal Opinion

Ziegler v. Findlay Industries, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 5, 2005No. 3:04 CV 7302PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KATZ, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Partial Dismissal (Doc. No. 9), to which Plaintiff has filed a Response and Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 14 & 15). Defendants have filed a Response to Plaintiffs cross-motion and a Reply regarding their own motion (Doc. No. 16). Plaintiff has filed a Reply in support of his cross-motion (Doc. No. 18). This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ motion is granted as to Counts One and Three and denied as to Count Six.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Edward E. Westlake v. William Lucas, Sheriff of Wayne CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peltz v. MorettiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Hawes v. Downing Health Technologies, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Gentry v. the Renal NetworkDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  4. Davis v. Walmart, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
  5. Spitzer Autoworld Akron, LLC v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API