State v. Duckett
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
¶1 We recently addressed the same question presented in this appeal. State v. Frawley, 140 Wn. App. 713, 167 P.3d 593 (2007). During voir dire, the trial judge here questioned selected jurors individually in the jury room, based on their responses to a questionnaire that asked about their experiences with sexual abuse. Nicholas Duckett waived his right to be present. However, the court *801never advised Mr. Duckett of his right to a public trial, nor asked him to waive this right. We conclude, as we did in Frawley, that this procedure violates a criminal defendant’s public trial right and reverse…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- In re the Personal Restraint of OrangeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- In re the Personal Restraint of MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. SadlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. WaldonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.