Edelschick v. Blanchard
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentMcMurray, Presiding Judge
1. The majority has concluded that defendants were not in default because their “motion for special appearance to contest jurisdiction” included a general denial. I do not agree.
In order to represent a general denial, the pleader must in good faith intend to controvert all averments of the complaint. OCGA § 9-*41410-8 (b). Upon an examination of the defendants’ motion, the only language which could conceivably support such a claim is as follows: “The Defendant’s [sic] have not breached any contract nor committed any tort within the State of Georgia.” This language is directed only to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stroud v. EliasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Clark v. AenchbacherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Houston v. Lowes of Savannah, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Batey v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Hulsey Pool Co. v. TroutmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.