Legal Opinion
Kuiper v. Givaudan, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided February 7, 2009No. C06-4009-MWBPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES’ MOTIONS IN LIMINE
MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND .1041.1042 II. LEGAL ANALYSIS..1042 A. Rule 104..1042 B. Applicable Standards...1044 C. Plaintiffs’Motion In Limine ..1046 D. Givaudan’s Unifíed Motion In Limine..1046 1. Risks to consumers ..1047 2. Health conditions of other American Pop Com employees.1047 3. Evidence regarding Givaudan employees ..1048 4. Evidence regarding other cases..1049 5. Evidence of other hazardous products or substances .....1049 6. Evidence of lung transplants…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Willie H. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Harvey M. RenvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Graves v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Estate of Thompson ex rel. Thompson v. Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013
- BNSF Railway Company v. Ronald Nichols, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
- Shannon v. KoehlerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2009
- BNSF Railway Company v. Ronald Nichols, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.