Pridmore v. Steneck

The opiaioa of the coart was delivered by

Hehek, J.

This case preseats cross-appeals. The defeadaat Heary O. Steaeck challeages the decree ia its eatirety. The complainaats assert error ia the dismissal of the bill as to the defeadaats George W. Steaeck aad Joha Steaeck & Soas.

First: There was ao fatal jurisdictional lack by reason of the non-joinder of the Steneck Trust Company as a party defendant.

The learned vice-chancellor, proceeding on the premises that recovery of the purchase price “is incidental to the rescission,” and there could be no such recovery “unless the corporation were a…