Legal Opinion

City Bank v. Hamilton Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 11, 1939No. 7311PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGroner, C. J.

The Hamilton National Bank, plaintiff in the court below, discounted two promissory notes signed by Arthur Berman and purporting to have been signed by Bernice Berman, his wife, and issued and delivered to Arthur Berman its cashier’s checks payable to the order of himself and his wife for the amount of the loans. These checks, indorsed with the names of the payees, were delivered by Berman to City Bank for deposit to his account, and the amounts of the cheeks — indorsed by City Bank “Prior Endorsements Guaranteed” — were collected by City ’Bank from Hamilton Bank through the clearing house.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jordan Marsh Co. v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Land Title & Trust Co. v. Northwestern National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. Robertson v. ColemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  4. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Natl. Bank of CommerceNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Murphy v. Metropolitan National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Land Title Bank & Trust Co. v. Cheltenham National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Home Indemnity Co. v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  3. Hibernia Nat. Bank v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  4. BF Saul Company v. Rich Wine and Liquor CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. Zions First National BankUtah Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API