Legal Opinion
BF Saul Company v. Rich Wine and Liquor Company
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 10, 1956No. 1736PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Woodward Liquors, cashed a number of checks bearing indorsements forged by defendant’s employee, Robert George. This suit for repayment of its loss was brought against the defendant-employer, B. F. Saul Company, as drawer of the checks, charging that plaintiff’s loss was due to the method of placing the checks in the hands of George and also to failure to maintain proper supervision of the distribution of the checks. The trial judge found for plaintiff and defendant brings this appeal.
The facts are not in dispute. Defendant Saul Company is engaged in the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Jordan Marsh Co. v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- American Sash & Door Co. v. Commerce Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Land Title Bank & Trust Co. v. Cheltenham National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Callaway v. Hamilton Nat. Bank of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gresham State Bank v. O & K Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Glenn L. Martin Co. Ex Rel. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Fidelity-Baltimore National Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Gresham State Bank v. O & K Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Joffe v. Riggs National BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962