Legal Opinion
Boyl v. California Chemical Company
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 11, 1963No. Civ. 62-240PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EAST, District Judge.
This action was tried to the Court without a jury, and it appears from the evidence that:
DEFENDANT AND PRODUCT
Defendant is a large manufacturer of agricultural-treating chemical products in the United States with more than 25 years’ experience in the formulation, experimentation, producing and selling of such chemical products, many of which have extreme toxicity and lethal potentials to humans, and through such endeavors has acquired outstanding and leading expertise in the field.
The defendant has over this period of time and in the regular course of its business,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Maize v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Chapman Chemical Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Farley v. Edward E. Tower Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Zesch v. the Abrasive Co. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- McClanahan v. California Spray-Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. And Cosmair, Inc. v. Edd Pruitt and Marjorie Ann PruittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- First National Bank Ex Rel. Huckleby v. Nor-Am Agricultural Products, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- Burch v. Amsterdam CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Ducote v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.