Legal Opinion

Harton v. City of Chicago Department of Public Works

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 12, 1998No. 1—97—4138, 1—97—4139 consPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoffman

Lorraine Hartón brought an employment discrimination claim against her employer, the City of Chicago (the City). The Illinois Human Rights Commission (the Commission) ordered the City to cease and desist from future discrimination, clear Barton’s employment records of reference to the discrimination suit, and pay Hartón limited attorney fees. Hartón appeals the Commission’s finding that she was not entitled to back pay and from its limited award of attorney fees. The City appeals from the Commission’s order that it pay Harton’s attorney fees. The appeals have been consolidated.

On November 16,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Zaderaka v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. City of Chicago v. Fair Employment Practices CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Northern Illinois Automobile Wreckers & Rebuilders Ass'n v. DixonIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Ruby Chevrolet, Inc. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Whipple v. Department of Rehabilitation ServicesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gilchrist v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  2. Fox v. Adams & Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2021
  3. Van Campen v. International Business MacHines Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. Rozsavolgyi v. City of AuroraAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  5. Jackson v. TSA Processing Chicago, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API