Legal Opinion

Gilchrist v. Human Rights Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 27, 2000No. 1 — 99 — 1054PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gallagher

This is a direct administrative review action in which an employee, Mary Beth Gilchrist (Petitioner), seeks review of a final decision of the Illinois Human Rights Commission (the Commission). The Commission found that Petitioner’s employer, the Chicago Park District (Respondent), did not discriminate against Petitioner.

Following is a brief summary of the facts relevant to our decision. Petitioner is a white female who was born January 15, 1945. She began working for the Respondent in 1977. In January 1990, the Respondent transferred Petitioner to the purchasing department in the position of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Zaderaka v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Business & Professional People for the Public Interest v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Boaden v. Department of Law EnforcementIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Granite City Division of National Steel Co. v. Illinois Pollution Control BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Raintree Health Care Center v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Vuagniaux v. Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Byung Moo Soh v. TARGET MARKETING SYSTEMSAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. People v. A Parcel of Property Commonly Known as 1945 North 31st Street, Decatur, Macon County, IllinoisIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Twardowski v. Holiday Hospitality Franchising, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API