Andrew Smith v. Jimmy Dunn, in his official capacity as District Attorney General of the 4th Judicial District of Tennessee, and his individual capacity, and John Does 1–10
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE ANDREW SMITH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No.: 3:25-CV-50-TAV-DCP ) JIMMY DUNN, in his official capacity as ) District Attorney General of the 4th Judicial ) District of Tennessee, and his individual ) capacity, and JOHN DOES 1–10, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This civil matter is before the Court on defendant Jimmy Dunn’s motion to dismiss, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) [Doc. 16]. Plaintiff has responded [Doc. 30], and Dunn has replied [Doc. 33].1 This matter is now ripe for the…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.