In re Marzocchi

Rosenstein, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection under 35 USC 103 of claims 7, 10,11 and 131 as obvious in view of certain prior art. After consideration of “the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue,” Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 US 1, 17 (1966), we affirm the decision of the board.

*909According, to-the specification, tlie invention relates to A natural rubber-resorcinol formaldehyde resin-composition for:use-in-dither sizing glass fibers or impregnating, yarns, cords and fabrics of glass fibers.- The…