Legal Opinion

Almas v. City of Havre

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1924No. 5,417PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ME. JUSTICE' HOLLOWAY

delivered the opinion of the court.

The city of Havre created Special Improvement District No. 90 for the purpose of laying water-mains and installing fire-protection apparatus. The improvements were completed and the costs charged to the property included in the- district. The assessments were made payable in four annual installments, the first of which became due in 1921. The district includes lots 4, 5, 6, 7 and the north half of lot 8 in block 1 of Pepin’s Second Addition to Havre, hut none of these lots abuts upon the improvements made. J. S. Almas, the owner of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shapard v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Stettheimer v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Duffie v. Metropolitan Sanitary & Storm Sewer District No. 1Montana Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Larsen Farms v. City of PlentywoodMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Smith v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Crawford v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API