Legal Opinion

Gray v. Thompson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1995No. Nos. 94-4009, 94-4011PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reversed and remanded with instructions to dismiss by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINS joined. Judge HALL wrote a concurring opinion.

OPINION

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

Coleman Wayne Gray was convicted of capital murder in a Virginia court. Gray exhausted his state remedies and then petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging, inter alia, that his sentencing violated the Due Process Clause. On that ground the district court issued the writ, and the Commonwealth of Virginia now appeals. We reverse and remand with instructions to dismiss the petition.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Gray v. NetherlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. James William Riley v. Stanley W. Taylor M. Jane BradyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  3. Lonnie Weeks, Jr. v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  4. Satcher v. PruettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  5. Satcher v. NetherlandDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API