Legal Opinion

City of Pembroke Pines v. Ortagus

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 2, 2010No. 1D09-6168PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarstiller, J.

The claimant in this worker’s compensation appeal is a firefighter for the City of Pembroke Pines (“City”). On May 11, 2005, during his annual physical examination, he was diagnosed with hypertension. His physician assigned him to light duty and prescribed medication. After several days off work and two days of light duty, the claimant returned to normal duty and was deemed to have reached maximum medical improvement (“MMI”) on May 17, 2005. He has needed continued medical treatment since then, including medication to control high blood pressure and cholesterol, semi-annual physical…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Engler v. American Friends of the Hebrew UniversityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  2. Fuller v. Okaloosa Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. City of Port Orange v. SedaccaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  4. City of Miami v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Esad Babahmetovic v. Scan Design Florida Inc/ Zenith Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. City of Jacksonville v. RatliffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. City of Panama City v. BagshawDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  4. City of Pembroke Pines v. HONESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  5. City of Pembroke Pines v. HonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API