Legal Opinion

Ross v. Couden

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 4, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMauck, P. J.

Henley H. Couden, by Ms amended petition in the common pleas court, pleaded that on the 28th day of July, 1923, defendant James A. Ross was a licensed dealer in securities under the provisions of Sections 6373-1 to 6373-22, General Code, commonly known as the Blue Sky Law; that on the day mentioned, pursuant to the third section of that act, he gave to the approval of the state commissioner of securities the bond provided for by that section, with the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company surety thereon. He alleges that thereafter, on December 27, 1923, the defendant Ross disposed of to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SummerlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Groby v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eichbauer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Citizens Bank v. Cameron & Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1941
  3. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Geo. W. Stone Co.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API