Legal Opinion
Ansari Mohamad v. Lawgical Insight, LLC, Andrew Bauta, Michael Russo, Rottenstreich Farley Bronstein Fisher Potter Hodas LLP, Meliza Miller, and Richard I. Segal
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided July 28, 2026No. 6:24-cv-02354Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION ANSARI MOHAMAD, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:24-cv-2354-JSS-LHP LAWGICAL INSIGHT, LLC, ANDREW BAUTA, MICHAEL RUSSO, ROTTENSTREICH FARLEY BRONSTEIN FISHER POTTER HODAS LLP, MELIZA MILLER, and RICHARD I. SEGAL, Defendants. __________________________________/ ORDER Defendants—Lawgical Insight, LLC, Andrew Bauta, and Michael Russo (the Lawgical Defendants) and Rottenstreich Farley Bronstein Fisher Potter Hodas LLP (RFBFPH), Meliza Miller, and Richard I. Segal (the Lawyer Defendants)—move to dismiss the second amended complaint…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.