Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 2009No. COA08-599PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEASLEY, Judge.

Mark. Stephen Thomas (Defendant) appeals from judgment entered on his conviction of second-degree murder. Because the trial court erroneously deprived Defendant of his right to use his remaining peremptory challenge, we hold Defendant is entitled to a new trial.

The evidence tended to show the following: on'11 October 2006, Defendant shot and killed Christopher Brynarsky (Brynarsky) at Brynarsky’s car repair shop. Brynarsky was the owner of Union County Customs (UCC), a car bodywork and paint business. Thirteen months prior to 11 October 2006, Defendant brought his Toyota MR2 to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. State v. WombleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  4. State v. McLambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HammondsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  2. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. Marsha McDonald v. Paul F. Shea, M.D. and Shea Ear ClinicCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012
  5. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API