Jacob v. City of Louisville
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
From the Louisville City Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chief Justice
delivered the Opinion of the Court.
The City of Louisville, intending to extend a street through the land of J. I. Jacob, to which he objected, procured a writ of ad quod damnum, which directed an inquisition as to the damage he would sustain by the extension of the street, after deducting the estimated value of advantage which would accrue to him from the proposed extension. Upon the inquisition, he proved that so much of his ground as would be covered by the street when extended, was worth about three thousand dollars; but nevertheless, the jury assessed in damages only…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sutton's Heirs v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1837
3Cited by12 opinions
- Buffalo Bayou, Brazos & Colorado Railroad v. FerrisTexas Supreme Court · 1863
- Newby v. Platte CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
- People v. Mayor of BrooklynNew York Supreme Court · 1849
- San Francisco, Alameda & Stockton R.R. v. CaldwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- In re Washington Road Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1857
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.