San Francisco, Alameda & Stockton R.R. v. Caldwell
California Supreme Court
The case came up from the County- of Alameda. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Currey, C. J.:
Appeal from the judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District confirming the assessment of damages for lands taken for the construction of the railroad of said company.
The railroad company filed in the office of the Clerk of said District Court in and for the County of Alameda, in which county the lands proposed to be taken for the use of the company are situated, a petition containing therein the matters necessary to be stated as provided in the twenty-fourth section of the Railroad Act passed in 1861. (Laws 1861, p. 619.) A time for hearing the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bloodgood v. Mohawk & Hudson RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Beekman v. Saratoga & Schenectady Rail RoadNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Livingston v. MayorCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1831
- Bradley v. New-York & New-Haven Rail-RoadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1851
- Hatch v. Vermont Central RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1852
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Stonesifer v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Continental Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1997
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Lynbar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Beaty v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.